What makes DFARS different from CMMC?

The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, or DFARS, was established in 2016 as part of the state’s attempt to defend against cyber-attacks. For DoD subcontractors dealing with protected information, this meant more requirements and evaluations.

To improve cybersecurity defense efforts, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) framework was created in 2020.

We’ll go through the distinctions among DFARS and CMMC, as well as how they’ll function together, in this post. You’ll be ready to obtain your CMMC maturity level with this knowledge. CMMC government contracting services providers can be the approach for robust CMMC compliance implementation.

What Makes DFARS and CMMC Different?

DFARS discusses how to preserve data, with a focus on CUI. The Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations (DFARS) were implemented in 2016 as a tool to assist federal contractors in better protecting sensitive data traveling in and out of their company. DFARS standards must be followed by all federal contractors and subcontractors, according to the DoD.

Compliance with the DFARS is relatively simple. To secure CUI, you should have the right security controls in place and mechanisms in place to make reporting any cybersecurity occurrences straightforward. Contractors can satisfy the DFARS goals of protecting against cybersecurity risks and responding to breaches as promptly and effectively as feasible by establishing both protections and reporting mechanisms.

Many of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) purposes are similar to those of DFARS. It’s aimed at subcontractors and federal contractors. CMMC is combining a number of distinct security mechanisms to form a competence-level structure. The varying levels of data security provided by government vendors are represented by these five levels of maturity. Companies with the proper CMMC maturity level for their requirements are partnered with the Department of Defense and government agencies.

CMMC and DFARS are comparable in many respects. They’re both aimed at how contractors secure CUI with security measures. In reality, CMMC strongly relies on DFARS. The maturity levels of CMMC are the most significant distinction between the two. Accreditation with CMMC is structured differently from adherence with DFARS.

CMMC vs DFARS regulations, on the other hand, maybe utilized in tandem to provide a safer system for vendors and the federal agencies with whom they work. You can survive growing cybersecurity threats by following DFARS requirements and attaining your CMMC competence level.

Why Are CMMC and DFARS Required for Contractors?

Why should you care about DFARS compliance issues now that the CMMC model will be implemented this season? Contractors must seek to comply with both the competency level criteria and DFARS to preserve data security since CMMC borrows from the security and safety controls and procedures described by DFARS.

By adding a validation element to how CUI is safeguarded, CMMC expands on an existing DFARS rule, DFARS 252.204-7012. DFARS is listed as a resource in the CMMC model’s definition of data that requires protection.

This application of DFARS to help specify the sorts of data that should be safeguarded demonstrates how important DFARS adherence is for maintaining security. CMMC is only the next stage in the endeavor to protect data. Finally, CMMC changes the way contractors are classified depending on their data security activities.